KAUT1$136.012.95%3.0% APY
KAGT1$56.711.20%0.1% APY
C1USDT2$0.9980.40%7.5% APY
BUIDLT2$1.0000.00%3.5% APY
BSTBLT2$1.000.00%0.0% APY
BRSRVT2$1.000.00%0.0% APY
USDYT2$1.140.71%3.5% APY
sUSDeT4$1.230.02%3.7% APY
LBTCT3$64,1100.10%0.4% APY
wstETHT3$2,1412.07%2.3% APY
KAUT1$136.012.95%3.0% APY
KAGT1$56.711.20%0.1% APY
C1USDT2$0.9980.40%7.5% APY
BUIDLT2$1.0000.00%3.5% APY
BSTBLT2$1.000.00%0.0% APY
BRSRVT2$1.000.00%0.0% APY
USDYT2$1.140.71%3.5% APY
sUSDeT4$1.230.02%3.7% APY
LBTCT3$64,1100.10%0.4% APY
wstETHT3$2,1412.07%2.3% APY
Incident tracker

Downgrades & Blowups

The depegs, defaults, exploits, and collapses that shape the Trust Score. A rating is only as good as its memory: this is the record of what has failed under stress, how badly, and whether it came back. Recovery counts as much as the failure.

Incidents logged
6
Critical
1
Recovered
4/6
MajorDepeg·Mar 11, 2023Recovered

USDC depeg after Silicon Valley Bank failure

USDCDAI

Roughly $3.3B of USDC cash reserves were stranded at the failed Silicon Valley Bank. USDC fell to about $0.88 before US regulators backstopped deposits, and it repegged within three days.

What it means for the score

A reserve-quality and counterparty event, not a protocol failure. Redeemability held once banking reopened. The scar sits on banking-dependency, and it recovered.

Recovery: Repegged within ~72 hours.

MajorExploit·Mar 13, 2023Recovered

Euler Finance flash-loan exploit

Euler

A donation and flash-loan attack drained about $197M from the Euler lending protocol. Unusually, the attacker returned almost all of the funds weeks later.

What it means for the score

A smart-contract and audit-dimension event. The near-full recovery is rare and noted, but it underlines that 'audited' does not mean 'unhackable.'

Recovery: Almost all funds returned.

MajorDefault·Dec 5, 2022No full recovery

Maple / Orthogonal Trading default

MaplesyrupUSDC

Orthogonal Trading defaulted on about $36M of undercollateralized loans in Maple's lending pools after concealing FTX exposure, impairing lender funds.

What it means for the score

The core risk of uncollateralized private credit: redeemability depends on a borrower's solvency, not on reserves. Unsecured pools score low on backing and redeemability.

Recovery: Partial recoveries; pools restructured.

ModerateDepeg·Jun 13, 2022Recovered

stETH liquidity depeg in the 3AC / Celsius unwind

stETHwstETH

stETH traded as low as ~0.93 ETH on secondary markets as forced sellers exited during the Celsius and Three Arrows Capital collapses. Withdrawals were not yet live, so it was never a redemption failure, and it reconverged to 1:1 after the Merge.

What it means for the score

A clean illustration of the redeemability dimension: a market-price depeg is not a backing failure. Track record was restored once 1:1 redemption proved out.

Recovery: Reconverged to 1:1 after withdrawals went live.

CriticalCollapse·May 9, 2022No full recovery

Terra UST algorithmic peg collapse

USTLUNA

The algorithmic stablecoin UST lost its dollar peg and spiralled as its mint-and-burn link to LUNA broke, erasing roughly $40B of value in days.

What it means for the score

The defining Tier-4 lesson: backing that depends on a sister token's price is not backing. Algorithmic pegs score at or near zero on the backing dimension.

MajorMechanism·Mar 12, 2020Recovered

MakerDAO 'Black Thursday' zero-bid liquidations

DAIMKR

A ~50% ETH crash plus Ethereum congestion let some Maker liquidation auctions clear at $0, leaving the system about $4M undercollateralized. It was recapitalized through an MKR debt auction.

What it means for the score

A mechanism and audit-design failure rather than a backing one. Maker recapitalized and hardened the auction system; track record reflects both the incident and the recovery.

Recovery: Recapitalized; auction mechanism reformed.

Incident tracker FAQ

What is the RWTS incident tracker?+

A curated log of the material failures in tokenized RWA and DeFi — depegs, defaults, exploits, and collapses — that inform the Trust Score. Each entry records what happened, how severe it was, whether it recovered, and which scoring dimension it stresses. It currently lists 6 incidents.

Does an incident permanently lower an asset's Trust Score?+

No. Under methodology v1.1, the Track Record dimension is conditional: an asset that suffers an incident and then demonstrably recovers can regain points over time. A market-price depeg that reconverges is treated very differently from a backing failure that wipes out holders. Recovery is part of the record, not just the failure.

Why track blowups at all?+

Because a rating that only ever looks at today's snapshot is worthless the moment something breaks. The whole point of the Track Record dimension is memory: which designs have failed under stress, which recovered, and what that implies for the ones that look similar today. We rate. You decide.

How incidents feed the rating

Track Record is one of the six Trust Score dimensions. See how it is scored, and how recovery restores points.

Read the methodology