RWTS Compare
sGHO vs C1USD
Side-by-side Trust Score comparison based on the RWTS Rating methodology. Six dimensions of structural trust, scored independently.
Savings GHO
sGHO
66T3
Trust Score
66
APY
5.60%
TVL
$250.00M
Higher Score
Currency One USD
C1USD
71T2
Trust Score
71
APY
7.50%
TVL
$2.87B
Dimension Comparison
| Dimension | sGHO | C1USD | Max | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asset Backing | 15 | 18+3 | 25 | C1USD |
| Proof of Reserves | 17+5 | 12 | 20 | sGHO |
| Redeemability | 11 | 12+1 | 15 | C1USD |
| Audit & Security | 12+3 | 9 | 15 | sGHO |
| Regulatory Standing | 5 | 15+10 | 15 | C1USD |
| Track Record | 6+1 | 5 | 10 | sGHO |
| Total | 66 | 71 | 100 | C1USD+5 |
Key Facts
| Attribute | sGHO | C1USD |
|---|---|---|
| Tier | T3: Secured DeFi | T2: Treasury & Fiat-Backed |
| Chain | Ethereum | Ethereum |
| Risk Level | Medium | Low |
| Backing | GHO overcollateralized by Aave crypto collateral; yield from GHO borrow fees + Merit rewards | 1:1 USD (regulated financial institutions, insurance wrapper) |
| Protocol | Aave | Kinesis Money |
| Lock-up | None (instant redemption to GHO) | None |
| Audited | Yes | Yes |
sGHO Details
Full profile and yield calculator
C1USD Details
Full profile and yield calculator
RWTS Methodology
How scores are calculated
This comparison is based on the RWTS Trust Score framework and is not financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold either asset. Always conduct your own due diligence.